gunnslaughter:

Proceed with me never shutting up about signing!Link and assertive!Link.

Sorry if the signs are confusing, trying to cram it into not too many panels.

[Comic shows Link and Sidon. Link is sitting with his feet in the water, while Sidon is leaning out of the water, resting his arms against the ground. They’re smiling at each other. Link’s eyes are heavily lidded. The signs Link uses each get their own panel. Text:

Sidon: [Squiggles indicating a long conversation] 

Sidon: We Zora must seem odd to your kind…

Link: [shakes head]

Sidon:

[surprised] No?

Link signs: I think you are very handsome. [big smile]

Sidon : [startles and blushes] … !!! I uh. ah… I! Oh! Well I! Thank you very much Link, I, I

Link signs: May I kiss … [leans in very close] … you?

end ID.]

Personal Violence – jerseydevious – Batman (Comics) [Archive of Our Own]

jerseydevious:

so @audreycritter had a headache so i wrote her some bruce and clark and she liked it so i was like what the hell, i’ll post it, even though i literally just got through posting a bunch of stuff including basically this same fic, but whatever i’m good it’s all good we’re fine here at fort jersey

Personal Violence – jerseydevious – Batman (Comics) [Archive of Our Own]

faenies:

kala-wolfgang-trash:

timisaliar:

raptortooth:

mybine:

lumos5001:

amazingpeetaisnotonfire:

sluttynuggets:

aphtaiwan:

johnhamishmorstan:

I don’t understand american school years what the fuck is a freshman or a sophomore why do you have these words instead of the numbers

what why would you use numbers

so IT FUCKING MAKES SENSE WHAT THE HELL IS A SOFT MOORE OR A FRESH MAN WHY ARE THE MEN FRESH

image

America makes no sense, as usual.

bless the person that actually made the chart

laughter from France

image

France what the fuck

@kala-wolfgang-trash

Hahahahaha yesss it makes no sense whatsoever. But I saw a French post that said it was the number of years left before the Baccalauréat (the national exam you have to take at the end of your “Terminale”). For example when you’re in 6th grade, you have 6 years left before the Baccalauréat, etc, etc.

I’m presenting you this mess we call education

[First image compares UK and US grade names. The other images each add another country to the chart. I’m only describing the final chart, slightly reorganized for ease of understanding. Text:

Columns are Ages, America, UK, France, and Italy.

5-6: Kindergarten (US), Year 1 (UK), Kindergarten (France), Asilo (Italy)

6-7: 1st Grade, Year 2, CP, 1 Elementare

7-8: 2nd Grade, Year 3, CE1, 2 Elementare

8-9: 3rd Grade, Year 4, CE2, 3 Elementare

9-10: 4th Grade, Year 5, CM1, 4 Elementare

10-11: 5th Grade, Year 6, CM2, 5 Elementare

11-12: 6th Grade, Year 7, 6th Grade, 1 Media   

12-13: 7th Grade, Year 8, 5th Grade, 2 Media  

13-14: 8th Grade, Year 9, 4th Grade, 3 Media  

14-15: Freshman (9th Grade), Year 10, 3rd Grade, 1 Superiore 

15-16: Sophomore (10th Grade), Year 11, 2nd Grade, 2 Superiore

16-17: Junior (11th Grade), Year 12, 1st Grade, 3 Superiore

17-18: Senior (12th Grade), Year 13, Terminale, 4 Superiore

18-19: 5 Superiore (Italy)

end ID]

anotherjadedwriter:

anotherjadedwriter:

history fucked me up

oxford was built and operational as a college before the rise of the mayans and cleopatra lived in a time nearer to pizza hut’s invention than to the pyramids being built

I need a noncomprehensive history book that covers Known World History in time periods, like “in this century, all this shit was happening concurrently” and not just all spread out so I have to piece it together like some unpaid uneducated scholar

I believe you mean the Aztecs, not the Maya. The Maya were already in the Postclassic Period by 1000 AD, when Oxford was still a pretty casual organization.

Also, something like “The Ultimate Timeline of World History,” by Christoph Marx might be a fun read. It’s necessarily VERY noncomprehensive, but shows you a wide variety of events from different cultures, all on the same page.

The DK World History Atlas has slightly more depth, but different continents are in different sections of the book, so you have to bounce back and forth. Still, since the entire book is dated maps, it’s pretty easy to compare.

And bill wutz’s history of the entire world, i guess is incredibly accurate and useful. You’ve probably see it. But watch it carefully and look us some of the names you don’t know. Every civilization mentioned is fascinating.

Anyways, these are fun books (and video). With pretty colours. And FACTS.

(Book links are to Amazon, just so you can see the cover of the books. All general history books have identical names, so pictures can help.)

penfairy:

if youre a writer and you want to know what multilingual ppl are really like, today I was giving directions to a Chinese couple but they were having trouble understanding me, so I turned to my gf for help and she explained it very slowly to them in English and sent them on their way. when they were gone I said “babe… you’re Chinese. Why did you give them the directions in English?” and she looked at me with utter horror, and that’s the story of how my gf forgot she spoke her own native language

minoractsofheroism:

We’re back!!! And Naime is looking flippant on the new page up on the SITE!!

Get all the exciting deets about Missveryvery and her broken arm over on the site when you read the new page! And thanks SO much to everyone for being patient with us while her arm mends!

And we have a shiny, exclusive-content filled PATREON as well as merch in the SHOP!

THEY’RE BACK!

Gorgeous as usual. It’s okay to wait longer, though. Missveryvery needs to get better!

sob-dylan:

victyrion:

crown-of-weeds:

define-space:

i really admire the design for these stairs and how they incorporate a wheelchair access ramp. in a world were barrier free design is essential to living a full and happy life, its amazing to see landscape architect Cornelia Oberlander has taken literal steps to design stairs AROUND a ramp, instead of the other way around.

This is beautiful.

Form AND function excuse me while I die

So I learned about this about a week ago in my Design & Activism class.  It is an elegant and ingenious example of equitable design and I’m so happy to see other people learning about it.

But I’m also really upset that no one has mentioned that it’s called a “stramp.”

okay, i have a problem: i’m aromantic and i don’t know how the fuck romantic love works, so idk how to write a romance without falling into the “romance is more important and better than friendship” bullshit. how is romantic love different from friendship? why do people fall in love? how does it feel? why do some people work well as friends and not as lovers? wtf i don’t understand anything

lets-get-fictional:

Thanks so much for your question, darling!  Romantic love differs for everyone, so a few
of the mods have come together to give you our opinions 🙂


What Defines Romantic Love?

Mod Joanna says:

Hi, love!  I
appreciate this question, because it’s something I’ve been working out myself
for a long time.  I’m demisexual, so I
really don’t experience physical/romantic attraction to anyone until I’ve built
a friendship with them.  That’s always
made it difficult for me to separate romantic love from a strong friendship,
because for me, they’re nearly one and the same.

But since romance is a big part of my writing (and has been
for several years), I’ve learned much more about romantic love and how to
separate it (fictionally and in reality) from platonic love.  In my experience, romantic love…

  • Functions, at its base, like a strong friendship.  The process of meeting a person, learning
    about them, becoming attached to them, desiring to spend time with them –
    these phases exist in all relationships.
    Falling in love seems to happen faster, though, because it’s accelerated
    by physical attraction.
  • Includes physical attraction.  Friends can be attracted to each other, but
    romantic, prolonged attraction grows and develops over time.  Affection tends to “blind” or warp one’s vision,
    so that even mundane traits or actions can become attractive.  Heres
    an LGF post on growing attraction!
  • Accelerates physical intimacy.  Romantic partners, after a certain amount of
    time together, have decreased physical boundaries between each other.  The safer two people feel around each other
    physically, the more affectionate and comfortable they become.  Often, couples start to think of each other
    as physical extensions of themselves (which is why some couples feel
    comfortable sharing drinks/gum/clothes etc.).
    This can be stronger for – but is not exclusive to – sexually active
    couples.
  • Fosters a deep, absolute affection for a person’s strengths,
    flaws, quirks, and humor
    .  It gives a desire to be closer to that person – to know
    them completely.  Romantic love is a
    long-term investment in someone’s hopes and dreams, and in helping them to
    achieve those dreams.  It’s a hope to
    see someone grow in good ways, to protect them from bad things, and to make
    them happy.
  • Inspires growth and self-love.  Feeling someone else’s affection and
    investment both spurs healthier life choices and alters one’s image of
    themselves.  People in healthy relationships
    are more likely to take better care of themselves, to be more ambitious and
    confident, and to be more content in hard times.

Ultimately, though, the biggest difference for me is the falling-in-love phase.  It’s much more rapid, and much less controllable than the beginning phase of a platonic friendship.  In contrast, the later phases of romance – facing differences and staying in love – are more trying than in extended friendship.  Being that intensely close to another person is a challenge as much as it is a pleasure.  Don’t forget that.


Mod Gen says:

Hey! When I saw this question I immediately had a few ideas,
as I’m asexual
and demiromantic and relationships for me are primarily non-physical and
more about romance and friendship. For me, romance isn’t so different from
friendship – I’m in a relationship that also blurs the lines of being a QPR
(queer-platonic relationship). Our relationship started as a friendship and
slowly developed into more romantic feelings. In my opinion and experience,
relationships/romance that have a basis in friendship are usually more
successful/healthy. Usually, romantic partners are also friends, some more
so than others. For this reason, I would say friendship is equally, if not
more, important than romance in a lot of cases (in my humble opinion).
Showing that two characters who are in a romantic relationship are also
friends is very important. They should have some sort of chemistry, or
banter, they should support each other, etc. etc.

Okay, I’m about to get real sappy: for me, falling in love with someone is
beautiful. I can barely begin to put into words how much I care for my s/o,
how much I miss her when I’m not around, how I can almost feel a physical
ache when she’s not there, how much I want her to be happy. I know her like
I know myself (probably better, actually), and I just feel so calm when I’m
around her. She puts me at ease, and simply being with her can make me feel
so much better and improve my mood. We don’t even have to talk or interact.
My heart doesn’t flutter when I see her; it calms.


Mod Daenerys says:

Hey there! First off, I want to say that a strong, healthy
romantic relationship should also be a great friendship. In my opinion,
the best romantic relationships are built off of friendships – not to mention,
in fiction it is very easy to fall into the controversial love-at-first sight
trope, which it seems like you are trying to avoid. It is also my opinion that
we tend to place more value on romantic relationships than we do on
friendships, which are equally important, if not more important for some
people.

I’m asexual, and biromantic, so relationships in my case are
more focused on those friendship sort of aspects, whether romantic or platonic.
As for falling in love, I think it comes down to having someone that you want
to be deeply, deeply close to. You find yourself wanting to place their
happiness above your own, you start thinking in terms of ‘we’ instead of
‘I’…that sort of thing. A romantic relationship seems to me to be about
holding each other up, pushing each other to achieve your goals, while also giving
them the space and freedom to be themselves. Falling in love with someone is to
have them teach you something about yourself, about the world. There’s a
certain closeness there that I think is different from friendships, and this
can come through in very subtle ways.

In terms of why some people work better as
friends than lovers, I think it comes down to that level of closeness. Romantic
partners tend to make more collective decisions, they work towards goals
together, they may eventually want to build a life together. Yet, we all have
friends that we love very dearly, but we know that if we tried to take on a
task like that together we would be at each other’s throats – either because we
have different goals, we think differently, or we tackle problems differently,
to the point that we piss each other off. There has to be a willingness to work
through problems together, things that don’t always apply even in our closest
friendships.


I hope some of this helps you to make the distinction between romantic and platonic love, and to really explore romantic love in your fiction 🙂  If you have any more questions, be sure to let us know!

– The Mods


If you need advice on general writing or fanfiction, you should maybe ask us!